Imperial Metals (IPM.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Imperial Metals (IPM.T)

IPM 1.960

+1.6%

Nov 5 3:45 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Italian Investor who wrote (1225)	2/6/2013 2:36:07 AM
From: refugee investor	Read Replies (1) of 1366

Thanks for the post. Maybe I should hurry up and put some cash to work with Bruce before it is too late. I would have saved a lot of time and trouble if I had taken the plunge with him in 2000 or whenever it was. Nice that he is so positive on BAC. Did you see the WSJ article about how institutions are leaving commodity index funds? I keep a very loose eye on RJA and it sure does not do a whole lot. How is the Jap bond play going? Thinking back on the leveraged fund, you are right of course it must be expensive to run it, the 1% cost are probably just the fees that go on top, the cost of the leverage must be baked in somewhere else.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next