SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ggersh who wrote (49960)2/9/2013 12:01:13 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (1) of 71475
 
It's the same way as solo. Got to cover
your arse in disclosure of risk or else
it will be on the platter. It's that trader's
fault, or greed, that put him to jail.
Even so, for any fund going out of business
ones arses must be adequately protected against
investors going after personal assets and/or (in case
they can't) jail time.

In case of Amaranth I am sure the trader acted against
fund risk disclosure, which brought Amaranth a lawsuit,
and the trader jail time. When you trade OPM, all your trades
are potentially public.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News