SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Horgad who wrote (85414)2/13/2013 12:12:19 PM
From: Joseph Silent  Read Replies (1) of 119361
 
This may very well be ......... who can say what the future holds? There is, however, a very important

step missing in that picture you have painted.

Yes. I can write a program that outsmarts the world's best human chess-player. That is because a human cannot hold the entire subtree that a particular move generates, and must work with limited memory intuition, knowledge and creativity. A computer simply holds all required possibilities for that move,and makes choices in a way that guarantees optimality. It would be like asking a human to run faster than a car.

We have unbounded creativity with organic limitations. Computers have zero (or bounded? Yet to be shown!) creativity and no organic limitations.

The problem is here: how does a computer learn how to solve a new problem? We are very far (if there is a distance involved) from a computer learning how to play tic-tac-toe. If we get there we can start to think about how it might learn to play chess or learn to solve useful problems.

We are very far from those spaces now, even though the ability of technology to surround us with gizmos clouds our perception of what is possible.

:)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext