SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Big Picture - Economics and Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Staff who wrote (493)12/4/1997 2:54:00 AM
From: Mike McFarland  Read Replies (1) of 686
 
When gold gets around $250/oz it will be very near the cost of
production, and maybe then people will be a little more enthusiastic
about buying some and the price will finally start recovering? One
problem with gold is that they keep taking it out of the ground, and
very little gets laid back in the ground each year. However, if there
are 100,000 tons of it around for banks and such to sell off over
the next decade or so, and say about 100m people in the world might
be in a position to buy some of the supply...that gives you about
1000 tons per million possible consumers, or maybe about a pound per person. (I dont know what kinds of tons these are etc etc...I just
want to get the magnitude sort of right)

Anyway, it seems unlikely that if all the world's gold reserves were
sold off in the next decade or so, that of the 100 million people who
might have totally disposable income each person might buy an ounce
or two a year? Or will they? Somebody else do the order of magnitude
game in their head too and see if I am way off. Maybe it is plausible
to sop all that gold up if it comes back into fashion, I guess I can
afford about a pound, not that I know where I'd put it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext