SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (702451)3/4/2013 8:24:36 PM
From: SilentZ  Read Replies (1) of 1573074
 
>Yet here is the Obama administration saying something to that effect regarding Woodward's analysis of Obama's political tactics. Even if the tone was non-threatening, the implication is clear. They think Woodward is going to pay one way or another for making these criticisms.

Read. Please. Sperling: "I apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. I do understand your problems with a couple of our statements in the fall -- but feel on the other hand that you focus on a few specific trees that gives a very wrong perception of the forest."

His implication was that Woodward was wrong and that he'd regret it when he wrote what he was planning to write, only to find out afterward that he was wrong.

How on earth can you see it differently?

I mean, Rahm Emanuel threatening a reporter? Sure. Probably happened a zillion times in Obama's last term. But Sperling? Come on.

-Z
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext