Plastic2Oil, Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Plastic2Oil, Inc.

PTOI 0.0001000

+899.9%

Oct 22 11:09 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Reseller Mike who wrote (517)	3/20/2013 6:01:50 PM
From: Rawnoc	of 621

5 year ban -- you are absolutely and completely dead wrong. Right at the top is says this is a CONSENT of judgment and references the 1/23/13 pacer doc. The 1/23/13 pacer doc says 5 year ban is what was consented to. The 3/18/13 order is identical to the 1/23/13 proposed order, in fact, the judge just literally crossed off the word "proposed" and kept the rest of it, copy and paste. The proposed and now final order itself for the judge merely references statues that give the judge the power to make rulings that are in line with the settlement. Even if one attempted to nitpick, the absence of a timeframe in the order would default back to the consent, especially since the 3/18/13 order references the consent without repeating the verbatim but gives the date and case number. Therefore unequivocally this is a 5 year ban. Lifetime ban is just as fictional as disgorgement. There's none of either. Did you catch this line by the way? "wavied findings of fact and conclusions of law" Looks like Johnik was 100% correct, as usual. The others cases just died a violent death.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next