SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (706165)3/27/2013 5:38:51 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation  Read Replies (4) of 1576123
 
>> I'm pretty sure it will be better in terms of "equal access" to health care services, and that in itself might be good enough of a reason. But is that worth the enormous cost, both on the ledger and hidden?

Ah. The bogus WHO standard. "Equal access". Which means, of course, "equally bad" -- since you can't afford to provide EVERYONE with the level of care most of us now receive. Which will utterly kill innovation, since no one will be striving for the best care (rather, the struggle will to provide some minimal level of care for everyone, and there will be no commercial insurance to subsidize government programs).

From an administrative perspective, one has to question how government can reasonably be expected to provide better health care to a larger number of people with lower cost when everything they touch becomes a money pit.

Equal access to equally bad health care is not a step in the right direction, and that is fairly apparent.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News