SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: steve harris who wrote (706217)3/28/2013 12:11:26 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1573010
 
Photo ID is free in Arkansas, my parents have them to do their banking business, same one will be used for voting.

LOL. Apparently not everyone gets free photo ID in Arkansas. That's why your guv vetoed the bill. Why don't you know this?

Arkansas: Governor Vetoes Photo ID for Voting

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Published: March 25, 2013

Gov. Mike Beebe vetoed legislation Monday that would have required voters to show photo identification before casting a ballot, saying the measure would infringe on the people’s right to vote, increase the state bureaucracy and cost too much in a tight budget year. State law currently requires poll workers to ask for identification, but voters can still cast a ballot if they do not have one. A new Republican majority in the Legislature said that restricting access to the polls would reduce voter fraud. The bill’s opponents said the measure would unfairly disenfranchise poor, elderly and minority voters. Legislators could override Mr. Beebe’s veto with a simple majority vote. Under the proposal, Arkansas would have provided free photo identification to voters, costing the state an estimated $300,000. Mr. Beebe, who is a Democrat, called the Voter ID bill “an expensive solution in search of a problem.” He said that while the attorney general’s office could not say for sure how the bill would fare if challenged in court, he feared new restrictions on voters could perhaps be unconstitutional.

link

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News