SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: deeno who wrote (22775)4/1/2013 3:47:39 PM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) of 24758
 
How they work together is proprietary, so if software application=technology, per your comment above, then yes that "technology" allows them the 160-300 mile per charge range.

The power train which is composed of more than battery and software is proprietary, or better put, sufficiently competitive.

The batteries are available to all.

I'm not sure about that. They all have some twist depending on other factors down the power train.

You mentioned then the unique power train.

No. I never used "unique" because it isn't that. It is good enough for Toyota to buy and that's significant.

Well I thought (and could be wrong) that was needed to handle those thousands of batteries. I dont think it would apply to most situations. And to say that the power train gave them a competitive position without having the batteries hardly seemed to me to be much "positioning".

You're having a hard time staying focused.

So now, what do you think about TSLA competitive position, whether its technologically based, and is it valuable?

I don't know. I was asking in case someone knew. I know various disconnected details.

The stock chart looks mighty good from a lt basis given its large ratio of price fluctuations to normalized slope.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext