SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ggersh who wrote (50888)4/7/2013 12:06:21 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) of 71456
 
I think the Japanese have been more open about the problem than many countries including Britain.

Here is the synopsis that includes Chernobyle but not Fukushima.

1963 was a bad year. However, even that was only about a 10% increase in radiation received from other background sources. The problem has to kept in perspective.

If you are near a dangerous radioactive source, or even worse if the source is inside of you, all calculations and figures shown do not apply. All managers of nuclear plants and their families ought to live close to the plant imho. It keeps the decision making process clearer.



unscear.org

Here is an interesting one. They can tell when you were born by the amount of nuclear bomb fallout material is in your body.

Document Title: Measuring atomic bomb-derived 14C levels in human remains to determine Year of Birth and/or Year of Death

Author: Gregory W. L. Hodgins

Document No.: 227839

Date Received: August 2009


ncjrs.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext