Detroit Free Press rebuffs reader demand to cover Gosnell butchery                 Saturday, April 13, 2013 2:11:55 PM       · by  Numbers Guy        Legal Insurrection ^ | 4/12/2013 | William A Jacobson
  “the reason I haven’t written about Mr.  Gosnell is the same reason Philadelphia journalists don’t write about  homicide trials in Detroit”
                             The butchery of infants born alive after abortions at the  Philadelphia clinic run by Kermit Gosnell is gruesome beyond  description, as described in my prior post,  A Culture of Death is their choice.
   The details are not new.  The horrific  Grand Jury Report (h/t  Dave Weigel) was issued over two years ago.
   Yet this mass murder, reportedly of 100 infants although only seven  cases were charged, has been met with near silence by the mainstream  media.   Kirsten Powers wrote yesterday:
    Infant beheadings. Severed  baby feet in jars. A child  screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven’t heard about these sickening accusations?
   It’s not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell  began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page….
   A Lexis-Nexis search shows none of the news shows on the three major  national television networks  has mentioned the Gosnell trial in the  last three months. The exception is when Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan  hijacked a segment on Meet the Press meant to foment outrage over an anti-abortion rights law in some backward red state.
   The Washington Post has not published original reporting on this during the trial and The New York Times  saw fit to run one original story on A-17 on the trial’s first day.  They’ve been silent ever since, despite headline-worthy testimony.
   Let me state the obvious. This should be front page news. When Rush  Limbaugh attacked Sandra Fluke, there was non-stop media hysteria….   Yet, accusations of babies having their heads severed — a major human  rights story if there ever was one — doesn’t make the cut….
   The deafening silence of too much of the media, once a force for justice in America, is a disgrace.
 
   One Legal Insurrection reader took matters into her own hands, contacting her local newspaper, The Detroit Free Press.
   The Freep has been nearly silent on the slaughter, running just  one story recently about the trial, an April 9 reprint from The  Wilmington (DE) News Journal:
     
    The story  linked to other stories about the case at USA Today.  Prior to that,  the only recent Freep story I could find about Gosnell was a reprint on  March 19 of a USA Today article about the start of the trial.
   The reader wrote to the Deputy Editorial Page Editor to complain:
   From: xxxxxxxxxxxx  Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:14 PM  To: Dickerson, Brian  Subject: Waiting
   And just where do I find your coverage and column on Kermit Gosnell.
   You tend to side with the Progressive view.
   Where is your column defending Kermit and his actions.
   Waiting,
   xxxxxxxxxxxx
   ———-
   From: Dickerson, Brian  Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:03 PM  To: xxxxxxxxxxxx  Subject: RE: Waiting
   xxxxxxxxxxxx:
   I suspect this disappoint your desire to confirm a more sinister  motive, but I submit to you that the reason I haven’t written about Mr.  Gosnell is the same reason Philadelphia journalists don’t write about  homicide trials in Detroit.
   Brian Dickerson  Deputy Editorial Page Editor  Detroit Free Press/A Gannett Company
 
   The reader also wrote to Leonard Pitts, a well-known syndicated columnist who writes for the  Miami Herald and whose columns appear in the  Detroit Free Press:
   On Apr 10, 2013, at 12:58 PM, xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
   Waiting to read your column on Kermit Gosnell.
   I am sure your insight would be valued.
   Calling out hypocrites.
   Respectfully,
   xxxxxxxxxxxx
   ———-
   From: Leonard Pitts  Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 2:07 PM  To: xxxxxxxxxxxx
   Subject: Re: Waiting ….
   Who?
   I’ve never heard of him.
   LP
   ———-
   On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:07 PM, xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
   Well,
   I would guess you’ve had enough time to Google “Kermit Gosnell”.
   When is your article exposing what Kermit did going to be printed?
   Or do you approve of Kermit?
   Hypocrite watch,
   xxxxxxxxxxxx
   ———-
   From: Leonard Pitts  Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:04 PM  To: Denise
   Subject: Re: Still waiting
   Actually, I haven’t Googled anything. I asked you an honest question  and waited for an honest answer, which I guess is not forthcoming. I  suppose I will look Mr. Gosnell up at some point just to satisfy my own  curiosity, but whoever he is and whatever he did, I doubt I’ll write  about it at this point. One thing I can’t stand is readers who think  they can bait or dare me into writing something in order to prove myself  to them.
   Get over yourself.
   LP
 
   I reached out last night to both Dickerson and Pitts for comment.  Neither responded.
   The slaughter of infants in Philadelphia should be on the front pages  of every newspaper, at least as much as the Newtown shooting was.  Just  like Newtown and serial killers like Jeffrey Dahmer, the Gosnell  bloodbath is not a local story.
   While no particular newspaper or columnist is obligated to cover  every event, the lack of news coverage, commentary and calls for action  across the breadth of the mainstream media regarding the murder of  infants born alive after an abortion is startling.
   We complain about mainstream media bias.  That bias is not just what they write, but what they ignore.
   Part of the legal insurrection is that readers have to demand the  mainstream media cover events which are politically incorrect, such as  the horror of late term abortion and the killing of infants born alive.
            |