SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (710210)4/18/2013 3:27:01 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) of 1577806
 
I'm not sure what use your description of "human life" is then. Pro-lifers are not arguing that its "human life" or even that "live begins at conception" although that is the language they use. What they are arguing for is that it should be treated the same, i.e. it has the same value. So the death of this "human life" whether its 25 years old, a new born, 3'rd trimester, or a zygote should be treated as equally serious issues.

What I'm pointing out is that despite people claiming this is what they believe, nobody seems to actually act that way wrt to zygotes. In fact, they act oblivious to the issue. Pro-lifers what to extent legal protection back conception (banning morning after pills as murder) but they seem to care not a wit that any couple trying to conceive with the woman in her 40's is likely to "conceive" and kill multiple (perhaps dozens) of "human lives" and nobody gives a damn. If those really were "human lives" someone should give a damn. Why don't they?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News