Mainstream Politics and Economics Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (41857)	4/23/2013 1:52:15 PM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 85487

>> Terrorist issues >> Saddam had none Well, a little, but I think everyone agrees that terrorism wasn't the primary reason for the Iraq War. I think it is important that everyone keep in mind that practically EVERY SINGLE PERSON who was in a position of having access to the intelligence supported the Iraq War. And as Condi Rice has pointed out time and again, you make the decision based on what you know, NOT on what you may not know. There are ten good reasons Saddam had to go, any one of which was sufficient. He should have been removed by Clinton after he failed to abide by the terms of the cease fire agreement, but Clinton didn't have the stomach for it. The US cannot allow Iraq to lead it around by the nose for ten years as Saddam did. And while no WMD were found, it is abundantly clear that Saddam or his sons would have been back in that business at the first opportunity.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next