SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GST who wrote (89575)4/25/2013 10:58:51 PM
From: Horgad21 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 119361
 
The constitution is suppose to protect the citizens against the government. Saying that we must protect the laws, police, and courts at all costs in order to protect the constitution when the laws, police, and courts have clearly overstepped their bounds is nonsensical. This is the very threat that the constitution was meant to stop. The only way to protect the constitution is to force the laws, police, and courts to operate under it not above it.

Clearly they trampled the spirit of the constitution during the search in Boston. There are 40 murders a day in the US, by your standards they could be conducting city wide searches and home invasions 40 times per day.

If you believe the constitution is not worth following just say it, but stop trying to say that the constitution allows for the type of unwarranted searching that went on in Boston. The laws may allow for it, but the constitution does not. Right now you seem to be arguing both for and against the constitution.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News