SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Conservatives
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Honey_Bee who wrote (9609)4/27/2013 12:48:44 PM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 124773
 
It's VERY likely that we were not wrong at all -- just naive.
I would say we were both, wrong and naive to the maximum.

I believed the blacks were not going to vote and flood the polls as the "experts" said. After Pigford and 4 years of distributing the wealth, how could they NOT vote near 100% to protect the freebies. As any shopper knows in any mall in the US, who is spending the money, and who is carrying the large bags filled with pricey items.

DUH DUH DUH

There was plenty of voting fraud, IMO.

Romney was not much different from McCain....nice guys come in last. IMO, he was so rich, he didn't care if he won or not.

The paid Republican experts were played like a fiddle.

So many Conservatives thought the election was in the bag, and stayed home instead of voting because Romney did not excite them. If they KNEW the truth, they might have held their collective noses (as many of us did) and voted.

Naive is a good word for us. I prefer STOOPID!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News