SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF
COMS 0.00130-13.3%Nov 7 11:47 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Andrei Rogosin who wrote (10093)12/5/1997 11:48:00 AM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest  Read Replies (1) of 22053
 
I was wondering about what you think Coms can do from here.
IMO we look in good shape. I really like the way COMS shareprice responded to the news.

Still looks like a solid 25% performer and while that isn't at those lofty levels of 30-50% that we have become accustomed to, it's still much better growth than most of the market's going to give you.

I have gotten to respect Eric B. more and more all the time and have confidence that he will take good care of my COMS holdings.
I trade alot, but I tend not to trade COMS that much. I view it as a long term performer and I have no worrys LONG TERM.

We should get a great pop in price when a 56 standard is finally set. I'm thinking that this will happen sooner than later.

All the players have been hurt by the lack of a standard and achieving this is obviously a high priority for ALL those involved.
The LU announcement inre meeting to get a standard reinforces this.

COMS should benefit more than anyone when a standard is finally set.
They still seem to be holding all the best cards including a couple up their sleeves .

I think these posts by Mr Scrapps and Mr Lawrence do a better job at discussing fundamentals than I can. (After all I'm just a dumb ole technical analyst<G>)
Message 2861950

Message 2863099

The article inre Eric B is worth a second read too.
Message 2867206
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext