SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Michael Burry who wrote (2655)12/5/1997 12:21:00 PM
From: Stewart Whitman  Read Replies (1) of 78576
 
forbes.com

Yes, I do agree that Quantum is the pick of the bunch. And I'll admit that the shift to thin clients will actually be much slower than many expect (anyone buying into a thin client company can attest to that). I'm not saying that hard drives will fall off the earth - just that it has the potential to become a negative growth industry in terms of revenue/net income.

The Forbes article seems to imply that Quantum is the only source of media. That's not true - Maxell, Fuji among others supply product. A little deceptive is the capacity (70 GB is probably the compressed format - 35 GB is native). In this respect, the current DLT technology is more of a medium-size backup media. Sony's AIT tape drives should compete with Quantum's DLT, and Sony's technology is more advanced in some areas. Also, Sony has published a long term plan to increase capacity.

Still, the market for tape products should remain robust. I've heard estimates in excess of 30% CAGR for this type of tape drive. And Quantum is certainly well positioned. But the question remains whether a disk drive business shrinking at say 5 to 10% a year, can be overcome by a tape drive business expanding at 30% a year.

Don't get me wrong, there's a price at which Quantum would be attractive to me, and it's not too far below the current price. I just see a lot of uncertainty, and think that the mutiple at which I would sell would be lower.

Stew
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext