Evolution Message Board - Msg: 28879394

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (35562)	5/7/2013 4:39:54 AM
From: Solon	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 69300

"CO2 is NOT a pollutant” Every Government and every scientific body on the planet disagrees with you. Walk into ANY University and talk to ANY professor or ANY first year student. Generally any substance that people introduce into the atmosphere that has damaging effects on living things and the environment is considered air pollution. The fact that things are natural (such as lead, sulphur dioxide, pottery glazes, and so forth) is irrelevant to the conclusion. According to the Blacksmith Institute as reported by Scientific American, these are the top ten pollutant problems: “artisanal gold mining; contaminated surface water; contaminated groundwater; indoor air pollution; metals smelting and processing; industrial mining; radioactive waste and uranium mining; untreated sewage; urban air quality; and used lead–acid battery recycling.” The degree to which carbon dioxide will be considered a pollutant will depend on the developing science around global warming. Because when carbon dioxide is referred to as a substance that has “damaging effects on human beings”, it is in this context of global warming--and not as competition to mercury or lead poisoning! LOL! Keep in mind that beneficial things can also be termed pollutants, when they are introduced in harmful quantities or inappropriate venues. Also, do not forget that your pretense against pollution is simply a contrived bit of acting, marshalled in order to bring extremists on side with your superstitions in the "Christian" world view. You know that extremists tend to lump things together, so your "thought" (my apologies to rats and monkeys -g- is that if you can imply that scientists are wrong about pollution...then perhaps they are wrong about Evolution and about the bronze-age absurdity of biblical myth? Perhaps every text in every library in every school on the planet simply represents a conspiracy of scientists to unfairly expose tribal tales as mythic--when they are actually historical and scientific! ;-) WHOOOO!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next