Immigration and its Reform Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Immigration and its Reform

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (167)	5/7/2013 12:51:30 PM
From: DallasKevin	Read Replies (1) of 270

Actually, no it would not be. You can only focus on the people part of the equation, thinking less brown people is better. I presented the facts as related to money, which is the driving factor behind any economic decision (not the people). All the other countries you mention do not border the US. Canada is not a factor in this for several reasons. One, almost all of their population is within 100 miles of the US border. Two, there is no way Europe or England (which still considers Canada to be a 'Crown Country') would allow interference in Canada. Mexico has a much more diverse base, in addition to having the second largest oil field in the world. Foreign companies are much more likely to invest money in businesses and plants in Mexico than the US because of the reduced production costs and regulations. At least they would if the country were stable. To say it is in the US best interests to have Mexico stable just because of the illegal alien issue is just absurd and false on the face of it considering the money and foreign investment the US would loose.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next