DTV
So, here are condensed CFSs for DTV for the last 5 years...
|
| 12 Months | 12 Months | 12 Months | 12 Months | 12 Months | Updated Normal 31-Dec-2012 | Updated Normal 31-Dec-2011 | Updated Normal 31-Dec-2010 | Updated Normal 31-Dec-2009 | Reclassified Normal 31-Dec-2009 | | USD | USD | USD | USD | USD | | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | Deloitte & Touche LLP | Deloitte & Touche LLP | Deloitte & Touche LLP | Deloitte & Touche LLP | Deloitte & Touche LLP | | Unqualified | Unqualified | Unqualified | Unqualified with Explanation | Unqualified with Explanation | | | | | | | | 2,977.0 | 2,636.0 | 2,312.0 | 1,007.0 | 1,613.0 | | 2,437.0 | 2,349.0 | 2,482.0 | 2,640.0 | 2,320.0 | | 2,437.0 | 2,349.0 | 2,482.0 | 2,640.0 | 2,320.0 | | -102.0 | 328.0 | 375.0 | 441.0 | 107.0 | | - | - | - | 0.0 | -6.0 | | 0.0 | 0.0 | -67.0 | 536.0 | 0.0 | | -131.0 | -109.0 | -90.0 | - | - | | 1.0 | 104.0 | 95.0 | -58.0 | -77.0 | | -130.0 | -5.0 | -62.0 | 478.0 | -83.0 | | -50.0 | -524.0 | -391.0 | -141.0 | 95.0 | | -206.0 | -33.0 | -35.0 | -12.0 | 18.0 | | 58.0 | -139.0 | -4.0 | -5.0 | -96.0 | | 370.0 | 391.0 | 437.0 | -215.0 | -23.0 | | 28.0 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 55.0 | 8.0 | | 173.0 | 31.0 | -38.0 | 89.0 | -84.0 | | 79.0 | 104.0 | 78.0 | 94.0 | 35.0 | | 452.0 | -123.0 | 99.0 | -135.0 | -47.0 | | 5,634.0 | 5,185.0 | 5,206.0 | 4,431.0 | 3,910.0 | | | | | | | | | -3,349.0 | -3,170.0 | -2,416.0 | -2,071.0 | -2,229.0 | | -3,349.0 | -3,170.0 | -2,416.0 | -2,071.0 | -2,229.0 | | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | -97.0 | 0.0 | | 24.0 | 116.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | | -16.0 | -11.0 | -617.0 | -37.0 | -204.0 | | -22.0 | 43.0 | -66.0 | 11.0 | 45.0 | | -14.0 | 148.0 | -683.0 | -123.0 | -159.0 | | -3,363.0 | -3,022.0 | -3,099.0 | -2,194.0 | -2,388.0 | | | | | | | | | -67.0 | -63.0 | -166.0 | -81.0 | 149.0 | | -67.0 | -63.0 | -166.0 | -81.0 | 149.0 | | -5,175.0 | -5,496.0 | -5,111.0 | -1,696.0 | -3,174.0 | | -5,175.0 | -5,496.0 | -5,111.0 | -1,696.0 | -3,174.0 | | 3.0 | 0.0 | 38.0 | 35.0 | 105.0 | | -5,172.0 | -5,496.0 | -5,073.0 | -1,661.0 | -3,069.0 | | 358.0 | 0.0 | 38.0 | 0.0 | - | | 0.0 | -39.0 | - | - | - | | 358.0 | -39.0 | 38.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | | 5,590.0 | 3,990.0 | 5,978.0 | 1,990.0 | 2,490.0 | | -1,951.0 | -1,184.0 | -3,987.0 | -1,885.0 | -170.0 | | 3,639.0 | 2,806.0 | 1,991.0 | 105.0 | 2,320.0 | | 3,997.0 | 2,767.0 | 2,029.0 | 105.0 | 2,320.0 | | -1,242.0 | -2,792.0 | -3,210.0 | -1,637.0 | -600.0 | | | | | | | | | 1,029.0 | -629.0 | -1,103.0 | 600.0 | 922.0 | | | | | | | | | 873.0 | 1,502.0 | 2,605.0 | 2,005.0 | 1,083.0 | | 1,902.0 | 873.0 | 1,502.0 | 2,605.0 | 2,005.0 | | 781.0 | 687.0 | 460.0 | 412.0 | 334.0 | | 1,406.0 | 1,042.0 | 705.0 | 484.0 | 706.0 |
I don't know the co well enough, but assuming that the depreciation is a reasonable approx of maint capex, the FCF is a touch higher than NI. So, say cum FCF for the last 5 years is $12B. They've bot back $20B of stock over that time and issued $11B of debt. Total BS debt went from $6 to $18B over the timeframe. |