SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Broken_Clock who wrote (90552)5/14/2013 5:37:19 PM
From: Travis_Bickle  Read Replies (1) of 119360
 
"a KMC security officer called deputies at about 11:55 p.m. Tuesday to report that there was a man in the area who was possibly intoxicated"

That doesn't jibe, they aren't going to call out the dogs because a pedestrian is drunk. Also note the "security officer" did not call 911, because all of those calls are recorded. Did he call the non-emergency sheriff's department number, and if so why did they respond like it was an emergency, and was the call recorded?

The recording of the call is important because of the "man in the area" part, if he was not trespassing then there was no crime other than public intoxication which is not all that rare. Based on the article it appears the man was on public property at the time of the incident.

I think it raises the question of whether this was some sort of vendetta.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News