wla(warner lambert) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : wla(warner lambert)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ted Downs who wrote (147)	12/5/1997 4:31:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) of 942

>>Then I understand you're saying that Warner Lambert is an unethical company is that correct? Also, by your implications you can also include the FDA with your statement is that correct? Did I not say in a post precedent that that accusation is precisely what I would never presume to make? exchange2000.com Yet you seem determined to derive that inference. Just because one decides to undertake an affirmative ethical act against their own interest that does make another that does less necessarily unethical. It depends on the facts and they are not complete at this time. What is troubling is that it appears that WLA decided to change its labelling disclosure concerning the risks only after Glaxo's actions. Take some Zantac, you and your gum company will both profit. Regards

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next