Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (39954)	5/23/2013 11:58:39 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 86356

LOL, Well science denier Rat, What I see in the chart is that it agrees with the satellite data, there has been no indication of global warming. You deny the scientific understanding of the saturation effect of a gas in absorbing the long wave radiation, the property that causes the misnamed green house effect. You deny the normal scientific practice of verifying a proffered operational rule of a system of verifying a predicted observable effect. All the models used by the self proclaimed CO2 driven Global Warming scientist predicted a warming effect in the atmospheric lapse rate. The effect is not there and thus all the models are shown bogus in their weighting of the effects of increased CO2 concentrations. The predicted change in the lapse rate also violates the second law of thermodynamics. The is a deep dodo mental visualization. But the other concepts are not that complicated. By the way, do you understand that there is far more CO2 below that hot spot than above it. Cannot you see that that CO2 is blocking the so called green house reflected radiation.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next