SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric who wrote (40047)5/25/2013 8:59:55 AM
From: Thomas A Watson5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
Your apparent refusal to comprehend how the IPCC chart that predicts results based up the the model equations that do not exist totally trash the underlying assumption that drive the model. That is the weighting of the effects of CO2 are bogus in the context of other factors. The models are junk. The models were the only pseudo science supporting the CO2 driving proffer. None of the math masturbation of temperature shows any association with CO2. The ice cores suggest temperature drives CO2 in that atmosphere by heating or cooling the oceans causes the amount of CO2 dissolved decreases as oceans get warmer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News