Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (40067)	5/25/2013 11:57:22 AM
From: Eric	Read Replies (1) of 86356

You are so funny! Your apparent refusal to comprehend how the IPCC chart that predicts results based up the the model equations that do not exist totally trash the underlying assumption that drive the model. That is the weighting of the effects of CO2 are bogus in the context of other factors. The models are junk. The models were the only pseudo science supporting the CO2 driving proffer. None of the math masturbation of temperature shows any association with CO2. The ice cores suggest temperature drives CO2 in that atmosphere by heating or cooling the oceans causes the amount of CO2 dissolved decreases as oceans get warmer. Maybe you need to find a new religion... Submit a paper to one of the major scientific journals and then we might listen to you. :)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next