Eric, the reason the Global Doomsters lost the argument [apart from the fact that reality did not match the Greenhouse Effect predictions which was the ultimate test] was non-arguments such as yours. "Whatever" and "You are not published in our censored Peer Review Private Clubhouse" are not arguments. People not in your private club are aware that those are not arguments. So, because you need to persuade people that the Alarmist theory is correct, and you don't, people who are wondering what to think are persuaded by those who seem to provide the better facts and reasoning. That comes from the Watts Up With That world of facts, reason, discussion, argument and the actual results of reality.
You might think you can simply say "Whatever". But that argument won't get you the public voting to load megatons of opm into the Alarmist coffers and ban CO2 production from the planet.
Gratuitous insults, threats and other non-arguments are also not persuasive. I don't mean the threats of Climate Change I mean actual physical and economic threats against individuals who dare to oppose the Alarmists. Actual threats have been made various times. Threats of gaol, excommunication, firing, punches in the face, and whatnot. Even death threats [due to violence, not CO2].
Over years here, and in Len's old stream [destroyed by Landshark in more demonstration of the lack of foundations for the Doomsters], the reasoning and facts from the Denialists have trounced Doomsterism every direction that's considered, backed up each time by reality confirming that doubt was justified.
Mqurice |
