SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric who wrote (40116)5/26/2013 2:04:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) of 86356
 
That's doubtful: < the vast bulk of the scientific community rejects your thoughts!

There is no "public club". But keep trying. That's what science is all about.

Darwin did not let criticism and the church stop him from publishing his landmark book.
>

Apart from the fact that science is not about fake consensus, they don't reject my thoughts. They don't know what my thoughts are. Some of them will reject some of my thoughts but they'll agree with others.

There is a private club of peer review which was used by the Jones and Mann Made Warming gang to preclude publishing and worse, funding is not available to people who think Global Doomsterism is false. Watts Up With That and others publish lots of things. I publish here.

It's notable that the Alarmist Doomsters are unable to argue the case. That's why they lost. They make ignorant abusive comments and ignore the opposing argument, thinking that they have automatically "won". That's why they lost.

Alarmists are now wringing their hands because they can't get the public to buy their rubbish and because nature has rejected their models too and temperatures are out the bottom of the graphs and snow in late May gives the lie to the idea that children won't know what snow is.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext