Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric who wrote (40137)	5/26/2013 6:10:20 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 86356

Dear Eric, I love it when you post info that make Curly Larry and Moe look brilliant. It seems the peer review was also reviewed by a peer or two and well the analysis makes your selected peer look like a flim flam charlitam. 97% Undercooked uncertainty Posted on May 24, 2013 by Anthony Watts Roman Murieka has a great statistical analysis of the Cook ‘consensus’ paper over at Climate Audit. There’s a surprise result: The number of papers endorsing AGW is falling, while the number of papers with no position is increasing. Looks like an increase in uncertainty to me. Read the whole post here Monckton has a go at the trend also, at The Collapsing ‘Consensus’

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next