SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (40226)5/28/2013 11:03:00 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (4) of 86356
 
It's not that everyone simply shuts their eyes as the tsunami approaches, counts to 10 and everything is back to normal."

Nonetheless, the sea is back to normal, with the samer number of mlecules as it had B4 the event. I leave it to you to figure out the number of additional molecules added to the oceans to raise world sea levels enuf to give a regional increase of 16 cm in NZ.

"You seem to not understand that 0.7 degrees temperature increase is likely not due to CO2 increase."

You seem to deny that it is.



Figure 1: Net human and natural percent contributions to the observed global surface warming over the past 50-65 years according to Tett et al. 2000 (T00, dark blue), Meehl et al. 2004 (M04, red), Stone et al. 2007 (S07, green), Lean and Rind 2008 (LR08, purple), Huber and Knutti 2011 (HK11, light blue), and Gillett et al. 2012 (G12, orange). This has been added to the SkS Climate Graphics Page.


"Especially since the CO2 heating theory has failed to match reality"

No; it doesn't match your reality. It does match what is happening on Planet Earth, tho, which is the only reality that matters.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext