Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (40227)	5/29/2013 12:46:53 AM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 86356

Yes, that's your theory. But good luck explaining the "travesty". The Global Alarmists realized years ago that their theory was bung and a travesty was going on. Correlation is not causation. Yes, there was 0.7 degrees of warming while CO2 rose. But oops a daisy, CO2 continued rising but the temperature did not. Travesty alert! I don't deny that extra CO2 might cause Global Warming. I simply observe that the climate and its variable causes are complex and the facts as demonstrated by reality have "denied" the theory of the Global Alarmists. Now there is a scramble on to adjust the theory to match the inconvenient truth. "Hey, lookit all that heat in the deep ocean". That's one explanation [excuse]. "Hey lookit all that air pollution". "Hey, lookit all those clouds." "Hey, umm, the other things too." Even the climate "scientists" acknowledge that the facts of reality are the determinant of scientific theory truth or not. The travesty continues Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next