SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Immigration and its Reform

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: longnshort who wrote (250)5/29/2013 7:41:15 AM
From: DallasKevin  Read Replies (1) of 270
 
wrong, clovis points are at the bottom of each site, ergo the first.all you have is some fire in mexico. no artifacts, the fire could have been started by white europeans or lightning
Just saying "nuh huh" don't cut it. And obviously you don't read nor retain what you read, as the proof I have sent clearly states man-made tools were found at the same sites dating back to the same period. Show me your proof. I have shown you mine from universities...and maybe way back when they believed what you are saying, but the evidence now shows Clovis to be relative newcomers...and from Asia to boot. How about this...when Europeans came to the New World, they discovered Mayans, Aztecs and Incas with more advanced civilizations...including indoor plumbing, of which there wasn't any of in Europe yet. They weren't close enough to the Chinese to steal gunpowder from. And the Chinese had rockets back during the time of Jesus...while Europeans were still primitive hunter-gatherer clans. And during this same time, civilizations here in the New World already had cities supporting up to a million people in them and advanced agriculture, including crop rotation and irrigation. So stop with the "white man has always been first and most advanced". It is simply not true.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext