Doug,
I doubt that I can answer all your questions but here is what I think I know.
Q. What happens when (and if ) Intel includes these kinds of capabilities in the CPU?
A. Intel don't seem too interested in 'cluttering' up their chips with a whole new set of instructions that wouldn't get used much. MMX is not multimedia on a CPU, quote Intel CEO Andy Grove "But we don't do the multimedia, we don't do audio processing on the microprocessor, we just have instructions in the microprocessor that allow those types of instructions to be processed faster. We didn't include those functions, we accelerated their processing on the chip."
Read this link posted earlier by Stephen Wall:
upside.com
Q. What happens when CPUs get 2x, 3x, and 5x the speeds they are today?
A. Same answer as above. Also in another Stephen Wall link is this quote from 3Dfx's CoB Gordon Campbell "With Intel, the beauty of the 3Dfx architecture is that it relies on the microprocessor enough that as Intel's processors' performance increases, it scales up our architecture. So every time Intel makes an improvement in its processor, we get an increase in performance because we designed the two to work together. We're basically able to piggyback on everything Intel does."?
redherring.com
Q. What would give better performance? A 300 MHz Pentium II CPU without 3Dfx or a 166 Pentium with 3Dfx?
A. I assume you are talking about 3D rendering because that's all 3Dfx does. Without a 3D accelerator, you would at least need a graphics card with some 3D capability if you want to run a 3D application. In that case the best the machine could manage is to do Direct3D well. D3D is a software interface that will pull some generic 3D functionality from your graphics card. 3Dfx allows developers to utilize its own set of features (lighting, Z-buffering etc) while not relying too much on the CPU. Depending on the game, but a game written for 3Dfx will look better on a P166 with 3Dfx but it will load faster on a P300 and may be easier to play.
Q. Might Intel license the 3Dfx technology and incorporate it into the CPU?
A. Already answered.
Q. How much does 3Dfx get per card from OEMs like Creative?
A. Don't know.
Q. What are the chances a company like Creative or Intel would try to buy out 3Dfx?
A. One can only speculate. Intel are major shareholders in 3Dfx. They seem to have a friendly relationship and I think they even share some Board Members. I think that if anyone was going to buy 3Dfx it would be Intel, but I would hate to see 3Dfx lose its identity. Next thing you know 3Dfx won't function with AMD chips :(.
Peter S |
