bilow, how can we discuss splits if you bounce around.
let's do them one at a time.
I have the actual numbers so i can see that we had a great move up in 1990 and 1994 and 1997.
lets. first discuss the 1997 split then we'll move to 1994 and then to 1990.
okay, in 1997 we are up 63% now and we'll be up almost 100% end on january..that's 6 months.
do you disagree or agree about 1997...
then we'll go to 1994 where were had another massive move up.
I'm counting the split move from WHEN THEY ANNOUNCED..NOT WHEN IT HAPPENED.....
SO, 1997..WHAT DO YOU SAY.
i TOLD YOU ABOUT 1990..IT WAS UP TO 75 AGAIN WHICH IS 150 AND A 50%
INCREASE TIL THEY REALIZED THAT FORGOT TO DEVELOP LOW COST PC.
BUT, WE'LL GET TO THAT AFTER 1997 AND 1994.
I promise if you do this it will be interesting.
History is so much better from someone who was there instead of folklore or ahsitory book<g>
Bilew, you are new to the thread....read the thread..I have more biting critism of cpq on this thread in 18 months than anyone and that includes stockman.
the bulls on this thread have threaten to throw me off several times.
I suggest you go to beginnng and read every thing. before you decude I;m in love with any stk.
Also, I have purchased more puts on just cpq dollar wise than
you could imagine in your wildest dreams.
Cpq has crashed 31 times since I owned it before it was public..
you are just talking and I've actually gone home after a week of cpq falling back down a million or 2 on paper with cpq crashes.
Cpq has planned in price drops that were paid for with 3q97 mney.
and they pan to drop the p166 and p180 to $500+ and make money.
Cpq at first went at Fareast with reglar box.
now they retooled and went back with sub k boxes. it's selling out
overseas and eurpoe is up 25% too.
Value line missed the fact cpq would drop prices to sub k.
Biliw, I cannot sell the stk...
the capital gains would eat me allive.
I have reveal one one positon with cpq...
I bet you that the puts I own on cpq make the puts you own right now look like a looney tune<gg>
SO, you make a point abut splits..
do you want to discuss splits or not,,,
I made my factual point about the 1997..
do, you agree or not..and why ,
and also, what's wrong with 63% increase after a crash<ggg>
then we'll go to 1994 and 1990 split.
we want talk about the 1982 split that was 3.75 to one and made everyone working for the compny a millionaire in 15 yrs including the janitor.
So, far all you have said is cpq is going to crash more bec. cpq is going to crash bec. cpq is going to crash..
and the p?e is too high<gg>
and I post tons of facts along with other people on thread
Try these
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com
exchange2000.com |
