SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 387.98+1.3%Nov 28 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: elmatador who wrote (101253)6/19/2013 6:20:00 PM
From: THE ANT  Read Replies (1) of 218092
 
Quite simply, the wealth effect is rendered moot by languishing incomes.

zerohedge.com

The Fed has made a tremendous mistake and is trying to back track. The wealth effect is far surpassed by the falling income effect. QE is a tax--only the wealthy benefit and their spending does not counter act the income fall that QE causes. It also distorts investment. Their policy is ultimately deflationary even if they continue it. Where is inflation? At the right time deficit spending will be needed. It should come from cutting out the FICA tax on individuals, but a divided congress and incompetent President unlikely to see this or react in the correct manner. Most likely a crash in the mkts will lead the Fed to continue QE for the next 20 years leading to a long Japanish deflationary outcome.If this happens it should mean low interest rates for as far as the eye can see. The Fed started QE because no one would act on the fiscal side. They should have stopped after QE II and dared congress to let the economy go down the hole (not have increased deficit spending) One side didnt trust Obama with spending and he wouldn't cut taxes
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext