Evolution Message Board - Msg: 28966428

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (37795)	6/22/2013 6:05:54 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) of 69300

Compare the two book titles: one is professional The Cambrian Explosion: The Construction of Animal Biodiversity . And Meyer's loaded Darwins Doubt , is supposed to allude to some epic failure being exposed where there is none. How disingenuous, why not be honest & call it "Genesis in the Cambrian" , then at least be truthful of the real intention? This is why he has to talk so much & comes off arrogant , like a gulity person trying to flim flam under examination to draw attention away from their trying to hide the feinted underlying deception. I really hope Meyers is up to date with all his examples, or it just comes off as another failed creationist attack on Darwin and as we all know its gone far beyond him now as the book by Irwin & Valentine readily show. Here's their finding: The important point is covered in a paper by Erwin et al. (2011). It shows that the main animal groups probably split gradually over a period of tens of millions of years before the "explosion" became visible in the fossil record [see The Cambrian Conundrum: Fossils vs Genes]. The authors show that the molecular data indicates an earlier divergence and trace fossils are consistent with that data.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next