SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 396.31-0.6%Dec 31 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
carranza2
To: Riskmgmt who wrote (101486)6/24/2013 8:10:20 AM
From: skinowski1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) of 218898
 
While there are parallels between the two, Ellsberg was a rather accomplished person, and he stood trial for what he did. Snowden is an undereducated IT security tech, and he seems to go to great lengths to avoid having his actions examined in court.

The broader questions are - does the government have a right to have secrets? To conduct intelligence operations? Do we really want the NSA and the CIA be the proverbial "open book"? Do we really want to see any IT tech making US policy? Personally, I think there is not a line - but a broad gray area - where whistleblowing ends, and betrayal begins. Are we willing to forgive the Rosenbergs for "idealistically" serving Joseph Stalin and giving him our nuclear bomb secrets?

Clearly, Snowden revelations indicate that our government has been engaging in policies of very questionable legality. In this sense, he may have done us all a favor. But he also may have broken the law. Members of the public - like us - are fully entitled to have opinions, but - as imperfect as our legal system is - there is probably no better way to settle this paradox than having the courts decide it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext