SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
longnshort
To: koan who wrote (47164)6/28/2013 7:22:19 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie1 Recommendation   of 85487
 
Gay marriage involves about 4% of the population of the country and is a huge existant fact we must address fairly.


If you are basing it on a percentage of the population rather than principle, then 96% of the population isn't involved in gay marriage, so we shouldn't bother with it. By your logic, if 4% of the population wanted to be able to marry 14 year olds, then we would have to address it because it was a huge existant fact. In fact, I bet the number of men who would marry 14 year olds if it was legal is greater than the number of homosexuals who want to get married. In fact, if you look at the age of consent activism in the gay world, you will see that it is pretty significant. That applies to the straight world too.
Polygamy is a choice. We can work on that one later.

Being bisexual isn't a choice. And if we want to make laws based on principles rather than percentages, then we can't forget them.

You continue to be a hypocrite on this topic. Until you come out for polygamy as much as you come out for gay marriage, you should be dismissed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext