When Adam Smith described the market as being guided by an invisible hand....A Smith was describing the market as a Superposition which produced Interference Patterns as result.
The non-classical nature of the superposition process is brought out clearly if we consider the superposition of two states, Supply and Demand, such that there exists an observation which, when made about the system in state Supply, is certain to lead to one particular result, About Supply subsets, and when made about the system in state Demand is certain to lead to some awareness about Demand subsets. What will be the result of the observation when made on the system in the superposed state? The answer is that the result will be sometimes skewed Supply information and sometimes skewed Demand information, according to a probability law depending on the relative weights of Supply and Demand in the superposition process. It will never be different from both Supply and Demand [i.e, either a or b]. The intermediate character of the state formed by superposition thus expresses itself through the probability of a particular result for an observation being intermediate between the corresponding probabilities for the original states, not through the result itself being intermediate between the corresponding results for the original states. [1]
The market is thusly a Superpositioning process where the information about Supply and Demand are functioning, creating Interference Patterns as proofs.
The last baktun ended in Dec 12. The new Baktun is underway and unfolding at its own pace as a counterprogram to correct for the deviation of a functioning invisible hand, which naturally results in interference patterns, as opposed to the breakdown associated with contrivances, imposed to create circular reference outcomes, which had been the highlight of the last baktun.. |
