| | | For anybody interested, I have been studying Enterprise Multiples as another way to look at value.
Valuation multiples are the quickest way to value a company, and are useful in comparing similar companies (comparable company analysis). They attempt to capture many of a firm's operating and financial characteristics (e.g. expected growth) in a single number that can be mutiplied by some financial metric (e.g. EBITDA) to yield an enterprise or equity value. Multiples are expressed as a ratio of capital investment to a financial metric attributable to providers of that capital. Specifically when trying to evaluate MLP's Enterprise Value (EV)is a better way to look at a company independent of their capital structure.
Enterprise value multiples are better than equity value multiples because the former allow for direct comparison of different firms, regardless of capital structure. Recall, that the value of a firm is theoretically independent of capital structure. Equity value multiples, on the other hand, are influenced by leverage. For example, highly levered firms generally have higher P/E multiples because their expected returns on equity are higher. Additionally, EV multiples are typically less affected by accounting differences, since the denominator is computed higher up on the income statement. The link above provides some ways to adjust earnings and ways to calculate Unleveraged Free Cash Flow. I generally only go this far in the analysis to help me verify if one of my top candidate stocks meets my valuation criteria when looking at their EV multiples. ---------------------------------------------------------
For a far more in depth review go to this link -pg- 24 titled Valuation Multiples: A Primer November 200124 UBS Warburg : Enterprise Value Multiples What Is Enterprise Value?
EV/EBITDA Definition: Core EV/earnings before associates, interest, tax, depreciation, amortization, non-cash changes in provisions and before reported exceptional items.

EV/EBITDA is affected by a firm’s level of capital intensity (measured as depreciation as a percentage of EBITDA). All things being equal, higher capital intensity results in a lower EV/EBITDA multiple.
EV/EBITDA is most useful in comparing companies with a selected peer group that has a comparable level of capital intensity; comparisons of a stock with a sector average can also be useful as long as there is not a large variation in capital intensity within the sector
EKS |
|