SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (725272)7/8/2013 11:20:03 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) of 1578871
 

(1) The "PA" wasn't the only testimony in the case, there were also two police officers who testified that Zimmerman had a broken nose.

Excuse me but you're going to rely on a cop's evaluation vs a PA's. Of course, you would. Duh!

(2) You obviously didn't understand what the PA said because the major news organizations differ with you on the interpretation. (3) Since the lack of a broken nose would be incriminating evidence, it was the State's duty to show that there was no broken nose. Regarding the nose, the State not only failed in its duty to show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the weight of the evidence is that Zimmerman did, in fact, have a broken nose. That's why the media, left right and central, all reported that Zimmerman had a broken nose. The fact that you don't accept this is an indication of just how far off in left field you've wandered.

I heard what the PA said. I listened to her verbal testimony. I know what she said. Drop it, bilow..........once again you're in over your head.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News