Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (725344)	7/9/2013 12:49:24 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1578803

>> Excuse me but you're going to rely on a cop's evaluation vs a PA's. Of course, you would. Duh! The real "duh" here is why you continue assert the PA's position was 180 degrees opposite of what it she testified to. She believed the knows was broken or at least the symptoms were those of a broken nose. Which was the reason for the referral to the ENT. >> I heard what the PA said. Let's look at exactly what she said, nitwit. The PA clearly stated his nose was "LIKELY BROKEN." Any continued claim that she said otherwise is just a damned lie, which we all know is something you continually do. RIONDA: You mentioned that he said, Mr. Zimmerman told you that he had told you that the nose was either broken or possibly broken. Is that correct? FOLGATE: That's what I was told, correct. RIONDA: Based on your examination of his nose, can you say the nose was broken? FOLGATE: I would say likely broken. It's hard to say definitively based of -- the fact that there were no x-rays to show the break itself. However most of the time a broken nose can be made clinically as well and that's based off of the black eyes that we saw, the nasolabial swelling, and the bruising.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next