SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bentway who wrote (726136)7/13/2013 12:38:40 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) of 1576445
 
The difference between now and 25-30 years ago is that we are getting to see the evidence that is presented to the jury. We got to see the judge's bias toward the prosecution. In this country, the assumption is supposed to be a presumption of innocence. We expect the prosecution to make their strongest case against the defendant. Which they did....with appeals to emotion rather than evidence. But we expect the judge to keep the court impartial. We all know that this wasn't the case. Like with OJ, we have to accept the verdict. But that doesn't mean that we don't know what really happened.

Are you going to accept the jury verdict when it comes back as "not guilty"?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News