SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (726457)7/14/2013 1:44:30 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Machaon
simplicity

  Read Replies (1) of 1579464
 
Talks about "prosecutorial misconduct."

Yes........the original Sanford investigator removed himself from the case after being pressured to bring charges.Then the state steps in with the Obama stooge special prosecutor Corey. The evidence should have been put in front of a Grand Jury......especially since the Sanford Police felt sufficient grounds were not present to even arrest. However, Corey could not take the chance that a Grand Jury would not bring charges so Corey dispensed with it entirely. I think quite possibly it never would have gone beyond a Grand Jury. In addition....look at the prosecutor in the trial.....he said he lost only one out of 80 murder cases. The state ONLY take murder cases they know are in the bag. Yet this one had NO chance of a murder conviction which shows how contrived the charges were. The attempted destruction of evidence really bothers me but again, I don't see who investigates and brings charges. It is amazing how a corrupt justice system at the top (Obama/Holder/DOJ) ) has the effect of all the underlings running wild because of no fear of retribution. Very scary stuff.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext