SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: epicure who wrote (71076)7/15/2013 10:23:57 AM
From: longnshort   of 71178
 
"No they aren't. He followed a teen against the advice of police. He could have retreated at any time. He could have let Trayvon go on his way. He could have stayed in his car. He could have run away. But he didn't. Imagine if this had been a white teen, and a black man with a gun stalked the teen, even though the police told him to leave the teen alone. Any guesses as to what the wingnuts would be saying about that white teen?

Why wasn't Trayvon standing his ground? Because he was the one being attacked by a man with a weapon."

Message 29004678

amazing how you libs repeat lies over and over again. did you even watch the trial ?

he wasn't in his car when the 9-11 operator (not the police) he was out walking when he said he was following trayvon (remember if you can the 9-11 operator said 'keep an eye on him') that's when the 9-11 operator said 'we don't need you to do that' and zim stopped. Now trayvon was 50 yards ahead and close to being home, four minutes goes by and trayvon jumps jorge, why didn't trayvon go home why did he wait 4 minutes to ambush Jorge ? and remember the POLICE never talked to Jorge, it was the 9-11 operator, which isn't the law, so stop lying

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext