SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (48762)7/17/2013 6:59:14 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 85487
 
College loan interest rates is a war on kids.

Quite the opposite, they are still getting a subsidy.

No pre school is a war on kids.

No one is forbidding anyone from going to preschool.

Expensive college is a war on kids.

Expensive partially because of those subsidized loans. Also again the students are still being subsidized. A subsidy is rather different than being the target for a war.

Making contraceptives tough to get is a war on kids.

Contraceptives are easy to get. Want to make them easier? Well you could support birth control pills being OTC. But all this war talk is just silly.

Literally waging war involves using deadly false on a massive scale. Figuratively waging war doesn't have to be actually deadly, but it has to involve imposing great harm. Slightly reducing subsidies, doesn't equal "imposing great harm". Reducing them to zero, wouldn't be imposing harm, it would be acting neutrally in the situation. To wage war on college students, even in a figurative sense, the government would have to make the net subsidy negative. It would have to be imposing fines or other penalties on those going to college (or preschool or whatever).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext