You can’t reduce a complex reality to nimrod~slogans, when nimrods try to do so, they minimize the
personhood of women and we know that the majority of abortions near 96% are done in the early stages. Your statement is false, there is no consensus in science when life & personhood begins, there's no consensus of there even being a consensus. This is just stating the facts.
It is true that human life requires conception as a first step but that is not the same as pregnancy or personhood. There is a process of 5-8days after fertilization when human life begins but we find 50-80% eggs never attach to uterine wall and silently aborted. So you have millions of abortions taking place every year, murdered early by the Intelligent Designer , this using your own definition of murder.
In 1973, Harry Blackmun wrote the SUPREME Court opinion there is no consensus of when life begins, no surprise you're caught lying again. When stuck in a helpless position of abysmal ignorance you have little chance of proving absolute morality, when natural abortion is a fact of nature. Fortunately women do have more powerful voices today, are not helpless, do have choice of when they wish to concieve, so consider your irrational relative moral position neutered.
"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theology are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate |
