SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3D Printing
DDD 2.1700.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Glenn Petersen7/31/2013 11:01:12 PM
2 Recommendations

Recommended By
bumblin bob
IngotWeTrust

   of 902
 
Study Finds 3D Printing Could Save The Average Home Up To $2,000 A Year

John Biggs

TechCrunch
July 31, 20o13



While I don’t have to remind you about the value of studies – many company-funded studies are best dropped directly in the trash after publication – this one about 3D printing does have some merit. Produced by the authors at Michigan Technological University, it posits that at a home 3D printer can provide a return on investment of 200 to 40 percent and can save the average home up to $2,000 in avoided purchase costs.

Here’s the money shot:
The results show that even making the extremely conservative assumption that the
household would only use the printer to make the selected twenty products a year
the avoided purchase cost savings would range from about $300 to $2000/year

Now obviously this is at once conservative and a bit of wishful thinking. While I, personally, have built a few hundred dollars worth of parts for various customers using MakeXYZ, I’ve yet to print more than a few dozen dollars worth of hardware for around the home including a new knob for our drier (upward estimate of $20), some hose clamps ($5), and a chess set for my son ($5). I don’t believe my Makerbot has paid for itself – yet – but there’s still next year.

The real ramifications of 3D printing, however, have little to do with cost savings. The authors note in their conclusion:
The potential implications of these results are i)expected rapid growth of
distributed manufacturing using open-source 3-D printing, ii) large-scale
adoption and shifts to life-cycle thinking in consumption, iii) growth of
localized cottage industries, and iv) a revitalization of hands-on engineering
based education.

Their assessment is that 3D printers like the RepRap and other cheap, open source devices will change the way we manufacture, allowing little guys like me to help others make cool stuff. For example, the drone in the picture above has legs that I printed for a MakeXYZ user named Anthony. These legs, if purchased at a hobby shop, would probably cost far more than the $40 or so I charged him simply because of their scarcity and demand. It is this exchange – my time and plastic for a few of his dollars – that is at the heart of this equation and the fact that he was able to design and print his own hardware on my machine is amazing to me.

We will soon have home 3D printers. It’s inevitable. How much they save us, however, is still in question. What isn’t in question is how much they’ll change our relationship to manufacturing in the long run. That is the truly exciting aspect of this study.

techcrunch.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext