SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: bentway8/4/2013 1:33:02 AM
  Read Replies (4) of 1575269
 
316 US Cities Are Doomed to Watery Fate

STUDY: ANOTHER 1,100 CITIES COULD SHARE SAME FUTURE

By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted Jul 30, 2013 1:02 AM CDT | Updated Aug 3, 2013 12:35 PM CDT

(NEWSER) It's already too late to cut greenhouse-gas emissions enough to prevent 316 American cities from eventually being partially submerged by rising seas, and the number whose fate is being "locked in" is constantly rising, a chilling new study finds. Researchers—who warn that emissions already released will cause the seas to keep rising for a long time—predict that if global warming keeps up its pace through 2100, the number of towns and cities locked in to a watery fate will swell to some 1,400, USA Today reports.

Cities and towns in Florida are most at risk, with Miami beyond saving by 2041 if current emission levels continue. Louisiana, New Jersey, and North Carolina each have 100 cities that could be doomed. The Guardian explains that those 1,400 locations represent ones where 50% of the current population "lives below the locked-in future high-tidelevel." The dates given in the study detail when the cities would be past the "point of no return," not actually underwater, notes the Guardian. And some big-name locations are already there. "Even if we could just stop global emissions tomorrow on a dime, Fort Lauderdale, Miami Gardens, Hoboken, NJ, will be under sea level," study author Benjamin Strauss, a scientist at Climate Central, tells the Guardian. Averting the sea-level rise will require emission cuts much deeper than anything politicians are currently considering, he says.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext