SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Fundamental Value Investing
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bruwin who wrote (3237)8/8/2013 5:59:30 PM
From: polarisnh2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brian Sullivan
tsigprofit

  Read Replies (2) of 4719
 
Bruwin,

I personally would not unload SLW as I believe, first of all, that we have seen the bottom to the silver and gold markets and with the leverage that SLW has as a silver streaming company that any upside to gold and silver will only cause a company such as SLW to leap up in price. Secondly, the only issue that appears out there is Barrick Gold's issue with the Pascua-Lama project located on the border of Chile and Argentina and this problem is Barrick's alone unless you feel that Barrick will file bankruptcy as they have pledged out streams to other mines until Pascua-Lama comes on line. The time to sell SLW would have been months ago. Right now I believe they hold tremendous value.


Cheers,
Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News