Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

one_less

TideGlider

To: combjelly who wrote (731887)	8/9/2013 11:29:04 AM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1575863

The ME's testimony was literally creamed by the expert testimony of the defense, Dr. Vincent Di Maio. First, the ME's testimony was terrible. If you watched it there was no way you could have come away thinking differently. The man looked like he had never testified in court before. Bumbling, fumbling, and ultimately, discredited. Di Maio, OTOH, was in command. He explained that he saw clear evidence of AT LEAST SIX IMPACTS on Zimmerman's head. He characterized them in excruciating detail as likely "the result of severe force", contradicting Rao's testimony straight on as well as that of Shipping Bao. He pointed out that you "can have severe head trauma without any marks on the head." But he also showed how the various injuries on Z's head could not possibly have occurred with a single blow.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next